Customer Service
Telefon: +44 20 7183 8739
Program: Mon–Fri, 9:00–17:00
Email: office@zylarisgroup.com
Most competition websites are not built for compliance. This guide breaks down what the Voluntary Code actually requires at system level — from age checks and spend limits to free entry routes, payments, and backend tracking.

The Voluntary Code of Good Practice for Prize Draw Operators is not just a legal document.
It is a system requirement.
If you run a UK prize draw or competition website with both paid entry and a free entry route, the Code changes what your platform needs to do. It is no longer enough to have terms and conditions, a prize page, a checkout, and a postal entry line hidden somewhere in the footer.
The platform itself must show that it protects players, explains how draws work, handles complaints, manages spending controls, supports account suspension, displays free entry routes clearly, and keeps compliance visible.
The Department for Culture, Media and Sport says signatories are expected to implement the Code fully no later than 20 May 2026, and operators signing after that date must comply from the outset.
This guide explains what operators actually need to build.
Not clause by clause in legal language.
But system by system.
This guide is for UK competition and prize draw operators who run platforms where customers can pay to enter, while also having a free entry route.
It is also useful for:
It is not a substitute for legal advice. A solicitor should review your final competition model, terms, and compliance position before launch.
But from a platform perspective, the question is simple:
What must your website and backend actually do?
The Code is built around three main areas:
The mistake many operators make is treating these as policy headings.
They are not.
They translate directly into platform features.
Player protection affects registration, age checks, spending limits, credit card rules, harm monitoring, and account suspension.
Transparency affects product pages, free entry routes, draw mechanics, prize delivery, winner publication, odds, and charity claims.
Accountability affects admin processes, internal reviews, third-party marketing, public compliance pages, and documentation.
In simple terms:
Your compliance has to live inside the system.
The public website is the first place compliance must be visible.
A competition website should not make users hunt for key information. Important rules, risks, and routes should be visible before the customer enters.
At minimum, the website should include:
This matters because customers, payment providers, advertising platforms, and potentially regulators all look at the public structure.
If the structure is vague, trust drops.
If the structure is clear, the platform feels serious.
Age verification is one of the first practical changes operators need to consider.
A simple checkbox saying “I am over 18” is weak.
A stronger system captures a date of birth, validates it, and prevents under-18 users from entering.
The platform should be able to:
This should not feel clumsy. If the process is badly designed, it creates friction and cart abandonment.
The key is to build age checks into the user journey cleanly.
The customer account area becomes much more important under the Code.
It should not only show orders and entries.
It should give customers control.
A strong account area should include:
This is where a competition website starts behaving like a proper platform.
The customer should be able to manage participation without needing to email support for every basic action.
That protects the user.
It also protects the operator.
Payments are not separate from compliance.
They are part of it.
The platform needs to understand who paid, how much they paid, what they entered, which product type they entered, and whether any spend restriction applies.
For example, if a credit card limit applies, the website must be able to identify and manage credit card spending. If instant win products require different payment restrictions, the checkout must recognise that product type and apply the correct rules.
The payment system should connect to:
A payment gateway alone cannot solve this.
The website, payment provider, and backend need to work together.
Spending controls are one of the biggest system requirements.
A platform should be able to track how much a customer spends across all draws during a defined period.
A basic implementation might track monthly spend per account.
A stronger implementation may include:
This is not just a compliance feature.
It is also a trust feature.
A platform that gives customers control feels more responsible and more mature.
Customers should be able to pause, suspend, or close their account.
This needs to work properly behind the scenes.
When an account is suspended, the platform should:
If the customer permanently closes the account, the platform needs a clear process that balances closure with legal, financial, and data-retention obligations.
Do not treat this as a simple button.
It needs workflow logic.
The backend is where the operator proves that the system is being managed properly.
A serious platform should log:
This creates an audit trail.
And an audit trail is what separates a serious operator from a risky one.
If something is challenged later, the operator should not be relying on memory, screenshots, or scattered emails.
The system should show what happened.
Customers need to understand how each draw works before they enter.
Each product page should explain:
This should be written in plain English.
Not buried inside long legal terms.
A useful section title is:
How This Draw Works
That simple block can build more trust than a full page of legal wording hidden elsewhere.
The free entry route must be visible.
Not hidden.
Not buried.
Not made difficult.
A good platform should display the free entry route:
It should explain:
This is a major trust point.
If the free route looks hidden, the whole platform looks weaker.
Marketing cannot suggest that entering prize draws is a solution to financial difficulty.
That means operators should be careful with language such as:
This type of messaging may create serious advertising and social responsibility problems.
Instead, marketing should focus on:
The Code sits alongside advertising rules, not instead of them. The Advertising Standards Authority regulates advertising across media using the CAP Codes, so competition operators must make sure their advertising is clear and socially responsible.
Your marketing process should include a basic compliance review before ads go live.
A compliant platform is not only what customers see.
It is also what the business can prove internally.
Operators should maintain:
This does not need to be complicated.
But it does need to exist.
If something goes wrong, the question becomes:
What process did you have in place?
One of the most powerful trust assets is a public compliance page.
This page should explain the measures the operator has in place.
A strong page might include:
Do not make this page sound like marketing fluff.
Make it calm, clear, and practical.
A good title could be:
Our Player Protection and Transparency Measures
This is where compliance becomes brand trust.
Most operators do not fail because they ignore everything.
They fail because they miss small but important details.
Common gaps include:
These gaps are fixable.
But they are easier to fix before launch than after the platform is live.
Before the deadline, review your platform against this checklist.
Website:
Customer account:
Payments:
Backend:
Marketing:
This is where Zylaris views the Code differently.
The Code is not just a compliance problem.
It is a digital infrastructure problem.
A prize draw platform needs:
Digital Presence: clear public pages, trust signals, draw information, and visible player protection.
Digital Systems: customer accounts, spend tracking, complaints workflows, CRM, automation, and reporting.
Digital Infrastructure: payment integration, hosting, security, data protection, audit logs, and performance.
If these layers are disconnected, compliance becomes manual and fragile.
If they are connected, compliance becomes part of the operating system.
That is the difference between a website and a platform.
No. It is aimed at prize draw operators using both paid and free entry routes. Skill-based competitions may sit differently depending on structure, so operators should get legal advice on whether the Code applies directly to their model.
No. It is voluntary. However, DCMS has made clear that signatories are expected to implement the measures fully, and poor adoption could lead to stronger regulation in future.
The implementation deadline for signatories is 20 May 2026. Operators signing after that date are expected to comply from the outset.
Not always. Some platforms can be updated. But if your website lacks customer account logic, spend controls, free entry visibility, complaints workflows, or backend logs, you may need deeper development work.
Start with the user-facing compliance structure: age checks, free entry route visibility, draw transparency, complaints page, and responsible play page. Then move into customer account controls and backend logging.
Yes. Zylaris can review the current structure, identify system gaps, and map what needs to be built or improved.
The Voluntary Code raises the standard for UK prize draw operators.
But the real message is simple:
You cannot run a serious competition platform with disconnected tools, hidden rules, weak checkout logic, and manual backend processes.
The platform must be built to protect players, explain draws clearly, track activity, support complaints, connect payments, and document what happens.
That is not just compliance.
That is infrastructure.
Zylaris builds Competition Platform Systems for serious UK operators who want structure, control, and long-term trust from day one.